<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2.1" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Lizards and the Law</title>
	<link>http://academicfreedomblog.org/2011/05/01/lizards-and-the-law/</link>
	<description>An opportunity to discuss the interface of faith, science, and culture</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 09:49:47 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2.1</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: Capt. Haddock</title>
		<link>http://academicfreedomblog.org/2011/05/01/lizards-and-the-law/#comment-40356</link>
		<author>Capt. Haddock</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 May 2011 10:27:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://academicfreedomblog.org/2011/05/01/lizards-and-the-law/#comment-40356</guid>
		<description>Er....so let me understand.......you think there is a conspiracy within science, to avoid defining the terms "species" and "evolution", as to do so might threaten the theory of  "Darwinian evolution"? 

Taking for instance the Wikipaedia entries for "species" and "evolution", what examples of deliberate obfuscation would you point to, in support of your contention?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Er&#8230;.so let me understand&#8230;&#8230;.you think there is a conspiracy within science, to avoid defining the terms &#8220;species&#8221; and &#8220;evolution&#8221;, as to do so might threaten the theory of  &#8220;Darwinian evolution&#8221;? </p>
<p>Taking for instance the Wikipaedia entries for &#8220;species&#8221; and &#8220;evolution&#8221;, what examples of deliberate obfuscation would you point to, in support of your contention?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

