You are currently browsing the AcademicFreedomBlog weblog archives for February, 2011.
- Comparative religion (4)
- Culture & society (78)
- History (29)
- Notable Quotes (19)
- Personal story (13)
- Politics (35)
- Science and faith (116)
- Uncategorized (44)
- March 11, 2012: Encouragement
- March 6, 2012: Legalistic life
- February 24, 2012: Burning Qur'ans and Burning Bridges
- February 8, 2012: The War on Religion
- January 24, 2012: Evolution in Excel
- January 11, 2012: Steno's Applied Science
- January 9, 2012: "Love" in the Bible and Qur'an
- November 6, 2011: The Problem with My Spouse
- October 23, 2011: Mind Brain Controversy
- August 26, 2011: How Old Is The Earth?
Blogroll
Chat
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- November 2011
- October 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
Archive for February 2011
What about the Platform?
February 9, 2011 by Dr. Mc.
Somewhere between the language of DNA and the fine-tuning of the universe is another level of design that deserves our awe.
I spent yesterday afternoon tweaking the Excel case I’ve written for my students, and I will spend all this morning doing the same. It is tedious, but there is a rush when an argument (conditional formula) finally does what I intend. I have written before about the amazing assumption that the arguments expressed in DNA so far surpass what I attempt in Excel, but it just dawned on me: What about the platform?
I’m impressed with my own successes at writing a program that is executed in Excel, but this is nothing compared with the Excel platform itself. It is so exact and yet so versatile as to allow me to write these arguments, sometimes allowing me to achieve my complex commands in a number of different ways.
The parallel is there with the chemical structure of the universe. DNA is indeed amazing, but it is merely a language made possible by the innate capacity designed into atoms and molecules. They may be assembled in such a way as to both inform and carry out instructions.
Simplistically speaking, they are like Legos, designed in many different sizes and shapes for maximum assembly possibilities. But unlike Legos, atoms have no need for new foundational parts being added, such as Star Wars or Harry Potter kits, as the audience matures or gains new cultural icons. As our cultures gain information, we simply discover new ways to assemble the original parts (and ways that they are already assembled beyond our imagination).
The original “kit,” which we picture as a periodic chart, gives every indication of being inexhaustible in possibilities. This suggests not only a designer, but one that might even be inexhaustible in qualities.
Posted in Science and faith | 3 Comments »