You are currently browsing the AcademicFreedomBlog weblog archives for the day March 30, 2010.
- Comparative religion (4)
- Culture & society (78)
- History (29)
- Notable Quotes (19)
- Personal story (13)
- Politics (35)
- Science and faith (116)
- Uncategorized (44)
- March 11, 2012: Encouragement
- March 6, 2012: Legalistic life
- February 24, 2012: Burning Qur'ans and Burning Bridges
- February 8, 2012: The War on Religion
- January 24, 2012: Evolution in Excel
- January 11, 2012: Steno's Applied Science
- January 9, 2012: "Love" in the Bible and Qur'an
- November 6, 2011: The Problem with My Spouse
- October 23, 2011: Mind Brain Controversy
- August 26, 2011: How Old Is The Earth?
Blogroll
Chat
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- November 2011
- October 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
Archive for March 30, 2010
One Flew Over the Finch’s Nest
March 30, 2010 by Dr. Mc.
I just finished reading Anthony Flew’s There is a God. Because he has been a life-long defender of atheism, whatever he had to say about his change of mind would be interesting. He begins of course with how he became atheistic, so I was well into the book before I learned what began the change. There it was on page 68: he heard a scientific explanation for why Darwinian evolution is not a satisfactory explanation for the world we experience. This is not his whole argument, but it is apparently what got the ball rolling. Flew contends that at publication of this book he is not a Christian, but I am intrigued that he includes as an appendix a dialogue with N.T. Wright, who logically explains why Christ must be who He says He is (the Son of God) and that He did what the Bible says He did (died and rose to offer us eternal life).
What I find most interesting is that Flew is now toying with the claims of Christ. It illustrates what I think is the primary reason Darwin’s theory is so ravenously defended. It isn’t because alternatives are so illogical, or even that introducing a metaphysical cause into the equation ruins all hope of scientific explanations of cause-and-affect. It is because immediately upon the admission of a creator follows the need to justify one’s own self before that Creator, Whoever that is.
Oh, there are many defenders of Darwinism who honestly think any alternative is unscientific, simply because they have been taught to consider nothing else. Among them are some Christians. But they do not typically represent the almost frantic rebellion against alternative views that we see from prominent Darwin defenders like Eugenie Scott, Richard Dawkins, and Michael Ruse.
Admitting the possibility of a designer is not a door to some pantheistic, Star Wars-type “force.” The same logic that precipitates a creator of mind says it must therefore have one. The logic that admits that life and its environment is purpose-driven leads inevitably to the conclusion that the creator has purpose.
Throughout history and across the present a common trait of humans is belief in a supernatural. Darwinism is a man-made dam to stop the flood of accountability to some superior being that all the rest of mankind naturally senses and that modern science suggests. The barrier to belief is artificial, and so are the excuses for not admitting it.
Posted in Science and faith | No Comments »