You are currently browsing the AcademicFreedomBlog weblog archives for the day April 27, 2008.
- Comparative religion (4)
- Culture & society (78)
- History (29)
- Notable Quotes (19)
- Personal story (13)
- Politics (35)
- Science and faith (116)
- Uncategorized (44)
- March 11, 2012: Encouragement
- March 6, 2012: Legalistic life
- February 24, 2012: Burning Qur'ans and Burning Bridges
- February 8, 2012: The War on Religion
- January 24, 2012: Evolution in Excel
- January 11, 2012: Steno's Applied Science
- January 9, 2012: "Love" in the Bible and Qur'an
- November 6, 2011: The Problem with My Spouse
- October 23, 2011: Mind Brain Controversy
- August 26, 2011: How Old Is The Earth?
Blogroll
Chat
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- November 2011
- October 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
Archive for April 27, 2008
Not Skeptical Enough
April 27, 2008 by Dr. Mc.
I want to be sure my readers are not only aware of books
like Bondage of the Mind., but of who promotes such books. I do not recommend the
review linked above, but to give you a flavor for its position, the sixth paragraph begins,
"Gold [the author] begins his book with a series of chapters detailing the Old
Testament’s failure to live up to the Orthodox claim that it is the word of God
rather than the writings of men." In other words, before convincing the reader
that belief in the the Bible is bondage, the author must convince the reader
that the Bible is rubbish. This is good. No, not that he thinks the Bible is
rubbish, that he thinks it important to begin with that. Some "thinkers" today
would dispense with the truth position as irrelevant. Regardless of what you or
I think of his truth arguments, at least he has not gone off that deep end.
If you will scroll up the page from the above-mentioned
link, you will find that the commentary is provided by the Skeptics Society.
Interestingly enough, the Skeptics Society does not completely live up to its
name. Its most recent magazine issue presents articles on both sides of the global warming argument, but in
its issue on religion v. atheism, even in its article
against Dawkin’s atheistic position, they cannot bring themselves to seriously
question evolution. I defend that observation by how the article objects to
Dawkins. He does not object to evolution in general. Indeed, "Darwin’s theory
was enormously bolstered" by the discoveries of genetics, the author says (no
evidence provided). He merely
objects that Dawkins thinks randomness leads to evolution. So the alternative is
God, right? Wrong. The author’s argument
is not that there is an Intelligent Agent behind the universe, but that the
universe itself possesses intelligence: "The universe evolved along intelligent
lines." (Personally, I’d translate that as pantheism.)
Lest you think this is an out-of-touch organization, please
note that their positive review of Bondage of the Mind is promoted in the
Arts & Letters Daily, a publication of the Chronicle of Higher Education, the
most recognized publisher in the American education world. Does that sadden anyone besides me.
———-
Posted in Culture & society, Science and faith | No Comments »