You are currently browsing the AcademicFreedomBlog weblog archives for the day March 10, 2008.
- Culture & society (59)
- History (25)
- Notable Quotes (13)
- Personal story (11)
- Politics (23)
- Science and faith (77)
- Uncategorized (15)
- November 30, 2008: Of Baramins and Baloney 5
- November 23, 2008: Of Baramins and Baloney 4
- November 10, 2008: Of Baramins and Baloney 3
- November 2, 2008: Good conversation
- October 19, 2008: Baraminology and pseudoscience
- October 5, 2008: No Matter What
- September 16, 2008: As easy as 1-2-3
- September 7, 2008: Not what they had in mind
- August 31, 2008: The momentum against logic and facts
- August 24, 2008: Orgnizations v. Organisms
Blogroll
Chat
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
Archive for March 10, 2008
The Other Far Side
March 10, 2008 by Dr. Mc.
Last week I blogged about a movie review and reviewer who
blindly opposed Expelled. This week I must comment on an example from the other
far side. Jack Cashill, executive editor of Ingram’s Magazine, wrote his
defense of Ben Stein’s Expelled. I say the other far side, because just
as Robert Moore obviously had made up his mind about his view of the film before
he entered the theater, so Cashill gives no attention to the film’s
short falls. He begins with a barrage of adjectives that do nothing but alienate
anyone who does not hold his same narrow opinions on a multitude of issues
irrelevant to the film and it’s topic. So, unless you wish to risk getting
unnecessarily distracted (even offended), skip the first seven paragraphs, and begin with "And into this breach,.." to see what he thought about the film itself. I found
new insight here. I have not seen the film yet–I keep getting invitations to
viewings that are hundreds of miles away–so I am not equipped to comment on the
film itself. Alas, I must confine my comments to the comments. There, now we have two contrasting biased views of the film. I guess you and I will have to wait to see the film ourselves to get a balanced view–or will we then?
Posted in Culture & society | 1 Comment »