You are currently browsing the AcademicFreedomBlog weblog archives for the day February 25, 2008.
- Culture & society (73)
- History (27)
- Notable Quotes (18)
- Personal story (12)
- Politics (29)
- Science and faith (110)
- Uncategorized (37)
- July 23, 2010: Science, Education, & Homosexuality
- June 27, 2010: Science v. Theology
- May 9, 2010: Goo and the Origin of Life
- May 2, 2010: An Appendix about the Appendix
- May 1, 2010: Ridicule and Rabbit Trails
- April 25, 2010:
- April 11, 2010: Myths about Mythology
- March 30, 2010: One Flew Over the Finch’s Nest
- March 26, 2010: The WHY Chromosome
- March 8, 2010: Reply to Ruse
Blogroll
Chat
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
Archive for February 25, 2008
Darwin v. Photoshop Tennis
February 25, 2008 by Dr. Mc.
There is an online game called
Photoshop Tennis, which
illustrates some valuable points about evolution. The game works basically like
this: A pictures is posted by someone, and others doctor the picture
slightly(?), one after another, using Adobe Photoshop. The results are sometimes
interesting, thoughtful, or funny. Darwin
himself made an appearance, in honor of his 199th birthday, but that one,
because of its strongly understood theme, is not typical of the works found at
Photoshop Tennis. That "theme" even seemed to some to require mention of the
Bible. The underlying concept has an obvious parallel with Darwinian evolution,
in that each picture is only slightly altered, and eventually major change has
taken place. But there are non-parallels, which may not be as obvious. Take for
instance Black & White or how about Mutant Fish.
First, the changes, no matter how slight, are not truly random. No one would
believe that the added person or bird or whatever in a picture is the result of
random digits dropped in. For one thing, they are recognizable. (They have
information.) All are obviously intentional and intended by someone exactly
where they are placed. Intelligence is required, regardless of how weird, or it
couldn’t happen. Second, the additions each take the picture into a new
direction. The more additions, the more bizarre and less meaningful the picture
becomes. For information to accumulate in a meaningful way, with any semblance
of direction, intelligence is not enough. There must be a united or integral
intelligence. In other words, one intelligent designer. This conclusion does not
require the Bible, just logic.
Posted in Uncategorized | No Comments »