You are currently browsing the AcademicFreedomBlog weblog archives for the day November 2, 2007.
- Culture & society (73)
- History (27)
- Notable Quotes (18)
- Personal story (12)
- Politics (29)
- Science and faith (110)
- Uncategorized (37)
- July 23, 2010: Science, Education, & Homosexuality
- June 27, 2010: Science v. Theology
- May 9, 2010: Goo and the Origin of Life
- May 2, 2010: An Appendix about the Appendix
- May 1, 2010: Ridicule and Rabbit Trails
- April 25, 2010:
- April 11, 2010: Myths about Mythology
- March 30, 2010: One Flew Over the Finch’s Nest
- March 26, 2010: The WHY Chromosome
- March 8, 2010: Reply to Ruse
Blogroll
Chat
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
Archive for November 2, 2007
James Watkins v. Political Correctness
November 2, 2007 by Dr. Mc.
Ignoring the countless blogger opinions, the most believable stories I have found about James Watson’s supposed racial comments are from CNN and Bloomberg. I say "supposed," because I will not accredit to him what Watson himself does not claim to recall. The backlash was huge, to the point of ending a noted scientist’s career. In any case the part I find most interesting is that the backlash does not involve a challenge for Watson to come forward with evidence. London’s Science Museum representatives are even quoted as saying "Watson’s words had gone beyond the point of acceptable debate." What I take that to mean is, "We don’t debate politically incorrect science." Worse yet, "We don’t debate politically incorrect scientists." By no means construe me to agree with the statement accredited to Watson, but should any scientific claim be dismissed or embraced simply on the grounds of popular opinion? The view so hot that evidence can not be considered by the scientific community (just like Creationism). The CNN article ends by digging into other questionable statements
Watkins made in the past, none of which are out of line with the theory of evolution that Watkins espouses. The Bloomberg article says "Watson’s comments in the London newspaper were in the same vein as some of those on intelligence, class structure, race and individual success in the 1994 book, The Bell Curve." Funny that this insult would be tossed into the ring, since the authors of The Bell Curve attribute its eugenic foundations to Charles Darwin on page one. I think it is time Darwinists admit the obvious, yet politically incorrect conclusions to which their theory leads. If the evidence does not support the superiority of one race over another (and it doesn’t), then the evidence does not support their theory. (See my Sep 21, 2007 blog for further clarification.) If Watkins did say what is attributed to him, at least he was being consistent with his theoretical basis. Any espousers of a scientific theory who avoid its natural conclusions for political correctness are either deceiving the public, or deceiving themselves.
Posted in Culture & society, Science and faith | No Comments »