You are currently browsing the AcademicFreedomBlog weblog archives for the day July 7, 2007.
- Culture & society (59)
- History (25)
- Notable Quotes (13)
- Personal story (11)
- Politics (23)
- Science and faith (77)
- Uncategorized (15)
- November 30, 2008: Of Baramins and Baloney 5
- November 23, 2008: Of Baramins and Baloney 4
- November 10, 2008: Of Baramins and Baloney 3
- November 2, 2008: Good conversation
- October 19, 2008: Baraminology and pseudoscience
- October 5, 2008: No Matter What
- September 16, 2008: As easy as 1-2-3
- September 7, 2008: Not what they had in mind
- August 31, 2008: The momentum against logic and facts
- August 24, 2008: Orgnizations v. Organisms
Blogroll
Chat
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
Archive for July 7, 2007
Fairness Doctrine v. Fairness
July 7, 2007 by Dr. Mc.
The Fairness Doctrine has resurfaced in the current legislation. It has its pros and cons, but the main problem I see is that the government is left to decide what is “fair.” Forgive me if I have said this before, but a student of mine, not too long ago, said he had found a balanced news station. I said, “If you found a balanced news station, then you have found one with the same bias that you have.” With the advent of the blogosphere we have a loss of communications control comparable to the advent of the printing press. If we try to force “balance” on mainstream media, the forced presentation of opposing views will so stick in the craw of those caring enough to express an opinion, that they will restrain from any presentation at all. This happened before under the Fairness Doctrine, but this time mainstream media would lose even more ground to the bloggers. The Dover School Board attempted to require balanced presentation with the disastrous result that teachers were required to read issued statements, regardless of personal beliefs. That was the first disaster, even before the big court decision. Requiring speech will never be a substitute for protecting speech.
Posted in Culture & society, Politics | 1 Comment »