<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2.1" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Richard Dawkins v. Michael Behe</title>
	<link>http://academicfreedomblog.org/2007/07/05/richard-dawkins-v-michael-behe/</link>
	<description>An opportunity to discuss the interface of faith, science, and culture</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 20 May 2012 12:28:47 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2.1</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: Atheism New Zealand</title>
		<link>http://academicfreedomblog.org/2007/07/05/richard-dawkins-v-michael-behe/#comment-28034</link>
		<author>Atheism New Zealand</author>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Jul 2010 07:33:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://academicfreedomblog.org/2007/07/05/richard-dawkins-v-michael-behe/#comment-28034</guid>
		<description>Richard Dawkins and his way of speaking has helped me make a nice clean transition from superstitious thinking and illogical religious belief to rational thinking and reason. My life has never been better.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Richard Dawkins and his way of speaking has helped me make a nice clean transition from superstitious thinking and illogical religious belief to rational thinking and reason. My life has never been better.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: m</title>
		<link>http://academicfreedomblog.org/2007/07/05/richard-dawkins-v-michael-behe/#comment-80</link>
		<author>m</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jul 2007 03:43:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://academicfreedomblog.org/2007/07/05/richard-dawkins-v-michael-behe/#comment-80</guid>
		<description>It always occur to me that darwinists like dawkins gave me the perception that they like to win arguments so much that they are willing to attack the opponents character and   make emotional comments rather than focusing on the facts and evidences. It may be a rhetoric technique or style but it biases me against their cause</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It always occur to me that darwinists like dawkins gave me the perception that they like to win arguments so much that they are willing to attack the opponents character and   make emotional comments rather than focusing on the facts and evidences. It may be a rhetoric technique or style but it biases me against their cause</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

