You are currently browsing the AcademicFreedomBlog weblog archives for the day December 29, 2006.
- Culture & society (59)
- History (25)
- Notable Quotes (13)
- Personal story (11)
- Politics (23)
- Science and faith (77)
- Uncategorized (15)
- November 30, 2008: Of Baramins and Baloney 5
- November 23, 2008: Of Baramins and Baloney 4
- November 10, 2008: Of Baramins and Baloney 3
- November 2, 2008: Good conversation
- October 19, 2008: Baraminology and pseudoscience
- October 5, 2008: No Matter What
- September 16, 2008: As easy as 1-2-3
- September 7, 2008: Not what they had in mind
- August 31, 2008: The momentum against logic and facts
- August 24, 2008: Orgnizations v. Organisms
Blogroll
Chat
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
Archive for December 29, 2006
The Baptist Amendment to the Constitution
December 29, 2006 by Dr. Mc.
I just discovered that the first amendment in the Bill of Rights can be directly linked to the political action of a Baptist evangelist. Elder John Leland was a first class evangelist of the Gospel, but that did not deter him from using his weight as leader of the Virginia (Orange) Baptists to secure freedom of religion in the Constitution Bill of Rights. In 1788, with the final state endorsements to the Constitution being desperately sought, James Madison met with Leland to persuade him to endorse the Constitution for Virginia. Leland promised support under one condition: That Madison develop amendments to the Constitution to assure religious liberty. They agreed, and true to his word, Madison authored in 1791 what we know today as the Bill of Rights, the first of which reads, “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof, or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.” When we look at the life purpose of such people as Leland, can we misunderstand the purpose of the First Amendment? With this results, is there any doubt that religious groups should be involved in political action?
Posted in Culture & society, Politics, History | No Comments »