You are currently browsing the AcademicFreedomBlog weblog archives for the day October 18, 2006.
- Culture & society (73)
- History (27)
- Notable Quotes (18)
- Personal story (12)
- Politics (29)
- Science and faith (110)
- Uncategorized (37)
- July 23, 2010: Science, Education, & Homosexuality
- June 27, 2010: Science v. Theology
- May 9, 2010: Goo and the Origin of Life
- May 2, 2010: An Appendix about the Appendix
- May 1, 2010: Ridicule and Rabbit Trails
- April 25, 2010:
- April 11, 2010: Myths about Mythology
- March 30, 2010: One Flew Over the Finch’s Nest
- March 26, 2010: The WHY Chromosome
- March 8, 2010: Reply to Ruse
Blogroll
Chat
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
Archive for October 18, 2006
Syncretism–the combining of incompatibles
October 18, 2006 by Dr. Mc.
I just learned a new word: syncretism. Like eclecticism, syncretism refers to the combining of two or more different philosophies or ideas, such as an eclectic room of furniture. (By the way, the room is only eclectic if the mix actually works together. Otherwise, it’s just an unappealing mess.) But unlike eclecticism, ideas combined syncretically are innately at odds, and the combining is forced–even self-falsifying. According to Wikipedia, syncretism particularly applies to the combining of exclusive religious views, which is the case when a person claims to believe the Bible literally and also to accept Darwinian evolution. The Bible says that God is proactive in our lives (actively pursuing a relationship with us and involved in our world). Darwinism says that all events are either directed by physical laws or are the result of random chance. The latter can only be true if no god ever has, ever would, or ever could intervene in the affairs of the universe. To attempt to combine these two philosophies requires that one philosophy or the other be compromised–syncretically.
Posted in Culture & society, Science and faith | No Comments »